WebFloeting v. Group Health Cooperative Sexual Harrassment in Public Accommodations. Washington Supreme Court. The Korematsu Center and Legal Voice filed an amicus brief in a case in which the court must interpret Washington's Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) to define what constitutes harassment and who is liable for it. The Center asks the ... WebChristopher Floeting alleged a Group Health Cooperative employee repeatedly sexually harassed him while he was seeking medical treatment. He sued Group Health for the …
CHRISTOPHER FLOETING v. GROUP HEALTH …
WebCHRISTOPHER H. FLOETING, Respondent/Plaintiff, v. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE, Petitioner/Defendant. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAELEGAL VOICE AND KOREMATSU CENTER Lindsay Halm, WSBA No. 37141 Schroeter Goldmark & Bender 500 Central Building 810 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 622-8000 Sara L. … WebJun 1, 2024 · Floeting v. Group Health Cooperative 750577 Oral Argument Recordings To listen to a recording, click the link. To download and save the recording to your computer, right click the link and choose the option to either save the Target or Link as... RECORDS Case Records Caseload Reports Court Dates Judicial Information System (JIS) JIS LINK citrus black beans instant pot
Wash. Justices Say Schools On Hook For Worker Sex Assault
WebJun 1, 2024 · King County Superior Court 15-2-18015-1 Christopher H. Floeting, Appellant v. Group Health Cooperative, Respondent Duration: 10 minutes for each side 1:30 PM No Oral Argument 74708-8 King County Superior Court 11-1-00319-8 State of Washington, Respondent v. John Lloyd Kirk, Appellant No Oral Argument 74828-9 King County … WebIn Floeting v. Group Health Cooperative, a case of first impression, the Supreme Court held (7-2) that, under WLAD, public accommodations employers ... In Floeting, a patient of a medical clinic complained to the clinic that he was “repeatedly sexually harassed” by one of the clinic’s employees. After receiving a complaint from the ... WebNov 21, 2024 · The Vargas family notes that strict liability may be appropriate under Floeting v. Group Health Cooperative, 192 Wash.2d 848, 434 P.3d 39 (2024), a case involving the Washington Law Against Discrimination, ch. 49.60 RCW. Resp. of Appellants Vargas to Br. of Amicus Curiae Bldg. Indus. Ass’n of Wash, at 8-12. dicks chapel hills mall